In my 8 years of iOS development, I've been part of struggling teams and exceptional ones. The difference isn't usually talentβit's how that talent is organized, motivated, and enabled to do their best work. As a Lead iOS Engineer, building a high-performance team is your most important responsibility. Here's what I've learned about making it happen.
Hiring: Building Your Foundation
Look Beyond the Resume
The best iOS engineers I've hired weren't always the ones with the most impressive credentials. I've learned to assess for:
1. Problem-Solving Over Memorization
Instead of asking "What's the difference between weak and unowned?", I present real scenarios:
// Show them this code and ask what problems they see
class ImageGallery {
var images: [UIImage] = []
var selectedImage: UIImage?
func downloadImages(from urls: [URL]) {
for url in urls {
URLSession.shared.dataTask(with url) { data, _, _ in
if let data = data, let image = UIImage(data: data) {
self.images.append(image)
}
}.resume()
}
}
}
Strong candidates identify:
- Thread safety issues (mutating array from background threads)
- Potential memory issues (holding full-resolution images in memory)
- Missing error handling
- Lack of cancellation support
- No loading state management
This reveals how they think about production code, not just theoretical knowledge.
2. Communication Skills Are Non-Negotiable
Technical brilliance is useless if someone can't:
- Explain their solutions to non-engineers
- Write clear documentation
- Give and receive constructive feedback
- Collaborate effectively
I ask candidates: "Explain SwiftUI's state management to a backend engineer who's never done iOS development."
Great answers use analogies, break down complexity, and check for understanding. Poor answers dive into technical jargon without context.
3. Cultural Fit and Values Alignment
I ask scenario-based questions:
- "You discover a critical bug 2 hours before a major release. What do you do?"
- "A team member's code repeatedly fails review for the same issues. How do you handle it?"
- "You disagree with an architectural decision made by another senior engineer. How do you proceed?"
Their answers reveal their values around quality, collaboration, and conflict resolution.
Structured Interview Process
Here's the process I've refined:
Round 1: Technical Screening (45 min)
- Live coding: Implement a simple feature (e.g., filterable list with SwiftUI)
- Code review: Review a problematic pull request
- Architectural discussion: Design a feature at a high level
Round 2: System Design (60 min)
- Design a complete iOS feature (e.g., offline-first messaging)
- Discuss trade-offs, scalability, testability
- How would you handle edge cases?
Round 3: Team Collaboration (45 min)
- Pair programming with a team member
- Work through a real issue from our backlog
- See how they collaborate, ask questions, and integrate feedback
Round 4: Leadership & Values (45 min with me)
- Past experiences and lessons learned
- How they handle conflict and failure
- Career goals and growth areas
- Questions about our team and culture
Red Flags I've Learned to Spot
- Ego Over Collaboration: Uses "I" exclusively instead of "we" when discussing past projects
- Resume-Driven Development: Only wants to work with the latest tech regardless of fit
- Blame Culture: Talks negatively about past teams/managers without self-reflection
- Closed to Feedback: Defensive when you question their solutions
- Zero Curiosity: Doesn't ask questions about your codebase, team, or challenges
Onboarding: Setting People Up for Success
Your first 30 days with a new hire are critical. Here's my framework:
Week 1: Environment and Context
Day 1-2: Setup and Orientation
- Dev environment setup (pair with senior engineer)
- Access to tools (GitHub, Jira, Slack, TestFlight)
- Walk through architecture documentation
- Introduce to team (1:1s with each member)
Day 3-5: Guided Code Exploration
- Assign a "buddy" (different from their manager)
- Have them trace through key user flows in the code
- Ship something small (fix a typo, improve a comment)
- First pull request review experience
Pro tip: I have new hires write a "beginner's guide" document. This:
- Forces deep understanding
- Reveals documentation gaps
- Creates resources for future hires
- Gives them a quick win
Creating Team Dynamics That Work
Establish Clear Roles and Responsibilities
Ambiguity kills productivity. For each team member, I define:
Technical Scope
- Primary area of ownership (e.g., networking, UI components, analytics)
- Secondary areas where they contribute
- Growth areas they're developing
Decision Rights
- What decisions they can make independently
- What needs team consensus
- What requires my sign-off
Managing Performance
Continuous Feedback, Not Annual Surprises
I give feedback within 48 hours:
Positive Reinforcement
"Great work on the image caching implementation. The performance improvement is measurable (50% faster load times), and your documentation makes it easy for others to use. This is the kind of thoroughness I want to see more of."
Constructive Feedback
"Your networking refactor has solid architecture, but the PR is 1,200 lines. This makes review difficult and increases risk. Let's work on breaking changes into smaller, reviewable chunks. I'd like to see PRs under 400 lines going forward."
Retention: Keeping Your Best People
Career Development
Every team member should have a growth plan:
Individual Contributor Track
Junior β Mid-Level β Senior β Staff β Principal
Focus: Technical depth and impact scope
Mid-level goals:
- Own entire features end-to-end
- Mentor junior engineers
- Contribute to architectural decisions
- Become domain expert in one area
Leadership Track
Senior β Tech Lead β Engineering Manager
Focus: Team impact and people development
Tech lead goals:
- Set technical direction for team
- Conduct code reviews and design reviews
- Mentor multiple engineers
- Represent team in cross-functional planning
Work-Life Balance
High performance doesn't mean constant overtime:
Protect Focus Time
- Block 9-11am for deep work (no meetings)
- Limit meetings to 3 hours max per day
- Async communication by default
Say No to Protect Your Team
"I understand this feature is important, but I won't commit my team to an unrealistic timeline. Here's what's achievable in that timeframe, or here's the timeline needed for the full scope. Let's discuss priorities."
Your team needs to see you protecting their wellbeing.
Handling Common Team Challenges
The Brilliant Jerk
Super talented but toxic to team culture:
First: Direct Conversation
"Your technical contributions are excellent, but your communication style is creating problems. When you dismissed Sarah's idea in the meeting yesterday, it shut down the discussion. I need you to be more collaborative and respectful. This is non-negotiable for our team culture."
If No Change: They Have to Go
No one is so talented that they're worth destroying team morale.
Knowledge Silos
When one person is the only expert in a critical area:
Rotation Strategy
- Pair programming on that domain
- Documentation requirements
- Design review presentations
- On-call rotation for that system
Forced Redundancy
"Every critical system needs 2-3 people who can maintain it. If you win the lottery tomorrow, the team should still be able to ship."
Measuring Team Success
Beyond shipping features, I track:
Technical Health Metrics
- Crash-free rate: Target > 99.5%
- App launch time: Target < 2s
- Build time: Target < 3 min for full build
- Test coverage: Target > 80% for business logic
- Tech debt ratio: Max 20% of sprint capacity
Team Health Metrics
- PR review time: Target < 4 hours for first feedback
- Sprint goal achievement: Target > 85%
- Bug escape rate: Target < 5 critical bugs per release
- Deployment frequency: Target at least weekly
- Employee satisfaction: Quarterly survey, target > 4/5
Conclusion: Your Impact is Multiplied Through Your Team
As a Lead iOS Engineer, your code commits matter less than your team's output. Your success is measured by:
- Are we shipping quality features consistently?
- Is the team growing in their skills?
- Are people engaged and satisfied?
- Is our technical foundation getting stronger?
- Can we adapt to changing business needs?
Build a team culture where:
- People feel safe taking risks
- Learning is continuous
- Quality is everyone's responsibility
- Collaboration is the default
- Individual growth is supported
When you get this right, you'll build not just great software, but careers and legacies. Your team members will look back years from now and remember you as the leader who helped them become the engineers they wanted to be.
That's the true measure of successful technical leadership.